Jemea Guy

9/11/18

READ-0304-301

Blog Post #1

Between the two authors, do you fundamentally disagree with one of the authors? Explore in detail the idea or ideas from either Brooks or Blow that you find especially short sighted. Yes I do disagree with one of the author because the details in Blow was more detailing and descriptive then in Brooks article for example he describe in step how his son was gun down and in Brooks he didn’t describe step by step on how the internet build people attentions in few example and Blow had more example and more personal opinion because the author put how he felt about his son being gunpoint and how he felt and police and guns. And they feel like they can do what they want because they have badge and a gun, and that not true because we as people have rights just like they do. When things like this happen make people not like the police and protest against them and he was unarmed possessed for no plunder are all the questions when people saw the police did to his son and not attempt to flee or resist in any way. And if it was they child they want someone to stand up and say something and do something if was their child and he is writing this so when this happens again people will know what to do in this type of situation or if something similar to this happen they would understand why he wrote this how he feeling and the people that been through this before they know how it feel about it but it really didn’t do much as he did about his son. And the Brooks article was different because at the end of the article people didn’t really feel the way felt or understood where he was coming from this why I disagree with the Brooks article then with the article Blow.